Yêu cầu chung
Question 1 - 8.
Read the following passage and mark the letter A, B, C or D on your answer sheet to indicate the best answer to each of the following questions from 1 to 8.
Many extinct species – from passenger pigeons to woolly mammoths – may now be reclassified as “bodily, but not genetically, extinct”, since their DNA can still be recovered from fossil specimens up to 200,000 years old. Developments in genetic technology may one day help bring such animals back to life. Only species whose DNA is too old to recover, such as dinosaurs, should be regarded as truly extinct.
The attempt to bring vanished creatures back to life will be expensive, technically difficult, and time-consuming, with no guarantee of success, so what makes it worthwhile? That something as final as extinction might be reversed, so that mammoths and passenger pigeons could be seen alive again, evokes the awe and wonder that drive all conservation at its deepest level.
Furthermore, the same logic underlying initiatives to protect endangered species applies to de-extinction plans: to restore and preserve biodiversity, advance scientific knowledge, and undo previous destruction. In this sense, resurrected species could become beacons of hope. While close examination of extinct species’ genomes can speak volumes about what made them vulnerable in the first place, living specimens would reveal even more. De-extinction techniques would also be directly applicable to critically endangered species, helping restore their genetic diversity. Lastly, as some extinct species once played vital roles in their ecosystems, bringing them back could also revive ecological richness and inspire wider conservation.
If de-extinction succeeds, today’s young people will have a chance to experience the return of some remarkable creatures in their lifetime – an experience that may define their generation’s attitude to the natural world and conservation. Given the number of species that have died out over the last 10,000 years due to manmade destruction, some resurrection and a measure of redemption are in order.
(Adapted from www.nationalgeographic.com)
The phrase “such animals” in paragraph 1 refers to ______.
bodily, but not genetically, extinct species
all extinct species
genetically, but not bodily, extinct species
truly extinct species
Giải thích chi tiết
✅ Đáp án: A. bodily, but not genetically, extinct species
🔎 Lí do:
Câu hỏi hỏi “such animals” đang thay cho đối tượng nào trong đoạn 1 → nhìn ngay câu đứng trước cụm này để tìm nhóm loài vật vừa được nhắc đến.
"Many extinct species … may now be reclassified as “bodily, but not genetically, extinct”" → Nhiều loài đã tuyệt chủng có thể được xem là “chỉ tuyệt chủng về cơ thể, chứ không tuyệt chủng về mặt di truyền”.
"Developments in genetic technology may one day help bring such animals back to life." → "such animals" = những loài vật như vừa nói ở câu trước, tức là nhóm “bodily, but not genetically, extinct”.
Câu sau còn đối chiếu rõ hơn: "Only species whose DNA is too old to recover … should be regarded as truly extinct." → Nghĩa là không phải tất cả loài tuyệt chủng đều thuộc nhóm “such animals”; chỉ những loài vẫn còn phục hồi được DNA mới đúng.
Vì vậy, đáp án đúng là A.
🚨 Những đáp án còn lại thì sao? ❌ B. all extinct species: Sai vì đoạn văn không nói tất cả loài tuyệt chủng đều có thể hồi sinh; chỉ nói những loài còn thu hồi được DNA. ❌ C. genetically, but not bodily, extinct species: Sai vì phương án này đảo ngược ý của bài. Đoạn văn viết rõ là "bodily, but not genetically, extinct". ❌ D. truly extinct species: Sai vì "truly extinct" là nhóm DNA quá cũ để phục hồi, ví dụ "dinosaurs", nên không phải “such animals” có thể được đưa trở lại.
