Yêu cầu chung
Question 1 - 8.
Read the following passage and mark the letter A, B, C or D on your answer sheet to indicate the best answer to each of the following questions from 1 to 8.
Many extinct species – from passenger pigeons to woolly mammoths – may now be reclassified as “bodily, but not genetically, extinct”, since their DNA can still be recovered from fossil specimens up to 200,000 years old. Developments in genetic technology may one day help bring such animals back to life. Only species whose DNA is too old to recover, such as dinosaurs, should be regarded as truly extinct.
The attempt to bring vanished creatures back to life will be expensive, technically difficult, and time-consuming, with no guarantee of success, so what makes it worthwhile? That something as final as extinction might be reversed, so that mammoths and passenger pigeons could be seen alive again, evokes the awe and wonder that drive all conservation at its deepest level.
Furthermore, the same logic underlying initiatives to protect endangered species applies to de-extinction plans: to restore and preserve biodiversity, advance scientific knowledge, and undo previous destruction. In this sense, resurrected species could become beacons of hope. While close examination of extinct species’ genomes can speak volumes about what made them vulnerable in the first place, living specimens would reveal even more. De-extinction techniques would also be directly applicable to critically endangered species, helping restore their genetic diversity. Lastly, as some extinct species once played vital roles in their ecosystems, bringing them back could also revive ecological richness and inspire wider conservation.
If de-extinction succeeds, today’s young people will have a chance to experience the return of some remarkable creatures in their lifetime – an experience that may define their generation’s attitude to the natural world and conservation. Given the number of species that have died out over the last 10,000 years due to manmade destruction, some resurrection and a measure of redemption are in order.
(Adapted from www.nationalgeographic.com)
The phrase “such animals” in paragraph 1 refers to ______.
bodily, but not genetically, extinct species
all extinct species
genetically, but not bodily, extinct species
truly extinct species
Giải thích Linear thinking
Ứng dụng 😎 Linearthinking để giải quyết câu hỏi:
✏️ Read structure:
S - Nhiều loài tuyệt chủng Many extinct species V - có thể được xếp lại may now be reclassified as tuyệt chủng về cơ thể, không tuyệt chủng về gen"bodily, but not genetically, extinct" , Vì since S - DNA của chúngtheir DNA V - vẫn có thể được phục hồi can still be recovered
S - Công nghệ di truyền Developments in genetic technology V - có thể giúp hồi sinh may one day help bring (...) back to life (?) - những loài đó such animals.
S - Chỉ những loài Only species RC - có DNA quá cũwhose DNA is too old to recover V - mới nên được xem là tuyệt chủng thật sựshould be regarded as truly extinct .
🔗 Logic:
Cụm “such animals” cần quay lại tìm nhóm loài vừa được nói đến.
Câu 1 nói: nhiều loài tuyệt chủng có thể được xếp lại là “bodily, but not genetically, extinct” vì DNA của chúng vẫn phục hồi được → có thể bring back to life.
such animals = những loài như vậy.
=> ✅ Correct answer: A. bodily, but not genetically, extinct species
🧐 Lưu ý:
❌ B. all extinct species: sai vì đoạn văn không nói tất cả loài tuyệt chủng, mà chỉ nói một nhóm có DNA còn phục hồi được;
❌ C. genetically, but not bodily, extinct species: sai vì đảo ngược ý gốc của bài;
❌ D. truly extinct species: sai vì nhóm này DNA quá cũ → không thể phục hồi → không thể bring back to life.
