Đề DOL soạn tốt nghiệp THPT môn Tiếng Anh năm 2025 - Mã đề 05

The National Innovation Challenge has opened applications for its 2025 round, offering grants to support ideas with significant potential to impact industries and society. The programme is open to university students from a wide range of fields, especially those with interdisciplinary projects. Applicants must demonstrate a clear problem, a workable solution, and measurable outcomes. Only a limited (1) ______ of proposals will be shortlisted for funding, so early submission is encouraged.

Candidates must also submit a supporting video and written statement that they explain (2) ______ their idea responds to an existing gap or need. The judging panel will prioritise proposals with strong societal value and technical (3) ______, as well as a realistic plan for implementation.

Once all submissions (4) ______, the committee will begin a double-blind review process that assesses innovation, feasibility, and presentation quality. In addition to financial support, winners will receive mentoring from professionals and access to specialised workshops designed to (5) ______ their solutions for scalability.

Finalists will be invited to pitch their ideas at the national showcase event, where they can (6) ______ interest from potential partners or investors.

Once dismissed as old-fashioned, historical sites are now attracting tech-savvy youth through a new digital lens. As Vietnam witnesses a surge in domestic tourism, heritage preservation efforts are undergoing digital transformation. A new wave of mobile applications has emerged, specifically targeting Gen Z and younger Millennials who are more likely to explore cultural sites through smartphones than traditional guidebooks. These apps go beyond static information delivery: they integrate real-time navigation, 360-degree site visuals, and embedded folklore narratives, creating what developers term "immersive heritage experiences." By combining education with interaction, they aim to reshape how young users perceive historical identity.

At the core of these platforms lies gamification. Users accumulate digital badges for visiting lesser-known temples, completing interactive quizzes on dynastic history, or unlocking AR-rendered artifacts hidden in virtual maps. Some apps introduce competitive leaderboards or mission-based rewards. The goal is twofold: to elevate user engagement and to incentivize travel to underrepresented locations. Tourism boards have partnered with developers to ensure historical accuracy while incorporating behavioral analytics to personalize content recommendations. This customization helps local governments monitor footfall patterns and assess the cultural and economic impact of each campaign. In turn, it offers a more responsive planning strategy for heritage promotion.

Yet despite their promise, these applications face adoption barriers. Many rural or mid-tier heritage sites lack the digital infrastructure necessary for app integration, including stable Wi-Fi or QR-enabled signage. Additionally, concerns over cultural sensitivity arise when gamified features risk trivializing sacred practices or oversimplifying nuanced histories. App designers have begun consulting with historians and cultural custodians to strike a balance between innovation and respect. As one designer put it, "We want to modernize access without compromising authenticity." Some platforms now offer cultural disclaimers or opt-out features to accommodate sensitive content.

Looking ahead, Vietnam’s Ministry of Culture and Information has launched pilot programs to test multilingual versions of these apps. Preliminary reports show higher site revisit rates and increased online sharing among teens. Officials also note more users choosing destinations in central and highland provinces. If scaled effectively, heritage tourism apps could enrich public historical awareness and contribute to more equitable visitor distribution—diverting traffic from oversaturated landmarks to hidden gems. These initiatives underscore how digital innovation can support cultural sustainability while keeping younger generations involved. The long-term goal is to foster lifelong appreciation for Vietnam’s diverse historical landscape.

The rise of deepfake technology, which uses artificial intelligence to create hyper-realistic but fabricated videos and audio, has swept across digital platforms, sowing deception at an alarming rate. Malicious actors, from scammers to propagandists, exploit these tools, now widely accessible due to affordable AI software and the vast reach of social media. Unlike traditional media, which relied on physical editing and was easily debunked, deepfakes mimic real people with chilling precision, often fooling even discerning viewers. [I] This technology, adopted to manipulate perceptions or gain illicit profits, erodes trust in what we see and hear, threatening the very foundation of reliable communication in an era already plagued by misinformation.

Deepfakes operate through advanced AI algorithms that analyze and replicate human voices and faces, producing manipulated media in mere minutes. Initially confined to tech enthusiasts and satirical content, their pernicious spread has engulfed social platforms, where videos of fabricated celebrity endorsements or fake political speeches go viral. [II] The ease of creating such content, requiring only a smartphone and free software, has democratized deception, enabling anyone to craft convincing falsehoods. While early deepfakes were crude, today’s versions are nearly indistinguishable from reality, amplifying their potential to mislead. Industries like entertainment still use them for creative purposes, but malicious applications—scams, defamation, and propaganda—now dominate, fueling public confusion.

The consequences are profound, as deepfakes intensify misinformation and fracture societal trust. Data privacy breaches, where personal images are stolen to create fraudulent content, compound the issue, while the digital divide leaves less tech-savvy populations vulnerable to manipulation. [III] This demands robust detection tools and stricter regulations, as outdated verification methods fail to address it. If unaddressed, deepfakes could deepen divisions, with fabricated media swaying elections or inciting unrest. Replacing deceptive content with measurable safeguards, such as blockchain-based verification, is essential to restore confidence in digital information.

Looking ahead, the unchecked spread of deepfakes risks destabilizing democratic processes and personal security. [IV] Without swift intervention, their ability to distort reality could render authentic media obsolete, leaving societies grappling with a crisis of credibility. Exposing this technology’s dangers and enforcing accountability—through AI detection systems and global policies—is critical to prevent a future where truth becomes indistinguishable from fiction, plunging us into an era of orchestrated deceit.

In recent years, the concept of digital detox has gained traction as more individuals begin to question the role of technology in their daily lives. While smartphones and social media platforms offer undeniable convenience and connectivity, they also contribute to growing levels of anxiety, sleep disruption, and decreased attention spans. (30) ______.

Interestingly, digital detoxing is not about rejecting technology altogether but rather about regaining control. Some individuals choose to disconnect for a weekend, while others schedule daily “screen-free” hours. (31) ______. Even these small changes are reported to improve mental clarity, emotional balance, and interpersonal relationships.

However, implementing a detox is rarely straightforward. Many people rely on technology for work, social interaction, and even relaxation, which makes the idea of turning off devices feel impractical or isolating. (32) ______.

Critics argue that digital detox is merely a trendy buzzword with no measurable impact. Yet this overlooks the growing body of research linking periodic disconnection with improved cognitive function and emotional resilience. (33) ______. Rather than an all-or-nothing approach, experts recommend intentional, structured breaks that align with one’s lifestyle and responsibilities.

Despite its potential benefits, digital detox still faces resistance in highly connected societies. Individuals often worry they’ll miss urgent updates, fall behind at work, or appear unresponsive to friends and colleagues. These psychological barriers can be more difficult to overcome than the physical act of putting away a device. (34) ______.

More people are choosing to shop online for convenience, but this trend has environmental impacts that cannot be ignored. Every click, shipment, and return adds up—especially when delivery speed is prioritised over sustainability. (35) ______, by making smarter online shopping choices, consumers can still reduce their carbon footprint.

One simple change is to consolidate your purchases into a single order (36) ______ placing multiple smaller ones. This reduces packaging waste and delivery emissions. Be mindful of how (37) ______ items you buy impulsively—many returned products are not resold but discarded or incinerated.

Shoppers should also check whether the company uses eco-friendly packaging or offsetting programs. Some brands clearly label these efforts on their websites. Before checking out, consider whether the item (38) ______ for long-term use or just short-term convenience.

Even the way you read product descriptions matters. Scan for terms like “biodegradable” or “recycled content,” and verify them through third-party certifications. Finally, if you realise something won’t meet your needs, try donating it rather than (39) ______ it unused in storage.

With thoughtful habits and responsible choices, online shopping can become a more sustainable part of daily life. Let’s not forget that convenience doesn’t have to (40) ______ the planet’s expense.